kabak
Guru
- Messages
- 662
- Likes
- 695
Welcome to Photoshop Gurus forum. Register a free account today to become a member! It's completely free. Once signed in, you'll enjoy an ad-free experience and be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
You're very welcome. Basically selected the subject, then expanded the selection by 10px. and then hit Generative Fill. It's not often that easy or quick.Look great Sir
Thanks
Please explain. What makes it more of a challenge or take longer?It's not often that easy or quick.
What does the AI think this is?
Any guesses from anyone? Name these objects.
Generative Fill/AI is not always the complete answer and I've found that if often takes additional editing using alternate tools to complete the image. In complex areas, the results can often be a hodgepodge of stolen items from other parts of the image. Not to say that it can't do some amazing edits. Laborious editing can be done with minimal effort by AI. But as with all edits, a serious eye by the artist is needed, to render a carefully curated image. That's the challenge and that's what takes time. Perfection might be an honorable goal but it can also be an elusive one. Or as a mentor once said to me, it's like trying to determine how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.Please explain. What makes it more of a challenge or take longer?
This is the part that I find to be the problem. Hodgepodge is now acceptable.In complex areas, the results can often be a hodgepodge of stolen items from other parts of the image.
That eye can't be too serious if it's accepting of hodgepodge! It can't or shouldn't be much of a challenge if it's just a matter of accepting hodgepodge results.But as with all edits, a serious eye by the artist is needed, to render a carefully curated image. That's the challenge and that's what takes time.
I agree! The level of perfection is set by the individual doing the work. It's really more like how many angels dancing on the head of a pin is considered sufficient? More for some and much less for others.Perfection might be an honorable goal but it can also be an elusive one. Or as a mentor once said to me, it's like trying to determine how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.
Good question. Considering the environment and the hodgepodge result, the AI did ALL of the lifting and it was deemed satisfactory. So I guess it did provide what was needed.......or did it?In the context of the image worked on here, has AI provided what's needed? Considering the environment, I think AI has done some decent heavy lifting.
You're right it's your responsibility, however if AI is involved, it is not your work. It's like turning in a paper that was partially written by AI. It's your paper but it's not completely your original work. In academia, this is considered plagiarism. What should it be called in the art world?any image that I post here is my responsibility with or without AI.
Satisfactory seems to be the new standard for excellence.Overall, the result is very satisfactory.
I think this discussion has gotten way beyond what @kabak had requested and is certainly unfair to him. Should be moved to another forum...I spent all of 10 minutes using AI for a quick and dirty job for illustration purposes. Never meant it as a prime example of AI quality.
This has always been in the Photoshop Board. This thread was a discussion. He's wanting to see how others get better/surprising results using AI. This was a good request since I too would like to see those results and how you accomplished them.Should be moved to another forum...
that a member with access to the AI possibilities of photoshop
tries to remove the person sitting next to the girl who is standing in the very center.
I do not think I can achieve the often surprising results
that some members achieve
He's wanting to see how others get better/surprising results using AI. This was a good request since I too would like to see those results and how you accomplished them.
Had this been an actual free request, he would not have asked specifically for AI results.
He did ask for a specific AI edit but based on a later post, he also wrote
Overall, the result is very satisfactory.
The person was replaced and the rest remains acceptable.
I removed the hand on the left and cut the person on the right side.
So thank you for her pre-wedding memory.
I would like to see someone put in a genuine effort and complete a usable edit. Unless you guys think that's already been done. In which case, I will just shut up.
PS. I have completed an edit for this image, but I did not use AI so I guess I'm disqualified.