That video is great! I now have an inside look at the insanity! That is one of the most unique approaches to creating paths that I have ever seen!
Yup... I agree with you. Which is why it's a great addition of knowledge we can point future visitors to. Bookmarking that post.
As to your method of creating a work path from a selection....have you seen the mess that makes? I believe you would spend more time cleaning that up than just starting afresh.....in my experience with selection to path conversions.
MrToM.
I agree with the mess it sometimes creates. But that depends on what you're working with.
https://www.photoshopgurus.com/foru...-logo-help-post1533720256.html#post1533720256 ... The second image was the result of my procedure. Despite the artifacts pointed out in the first image, the resulting work path did not contain any trace of the blemishes. Of course, I had to crop out the excess you pointed out and made sure there was nothing else in the layer (there were actually none).
In the conversion, there were several uneeded anchor points - like double nodes at sharp angled areas and along certain curves. These were easily deleted and I'm still left with enough nodes along the transition (areas of inflection as referred to in other vector apps) to get the symmetry right.
I might be wrong but others may probably get different anchor point results from converting the selection to paths. Happened to me before in my old workplace when another guy was doing the same thing on an image I was also working on but on another computer... lol.
The only problem I had was wrestling with the anchors but it was worth the wrangling. I reused/tweaked the work path when I wasn't satisfied with my first try.
I think what I posted above was my third try? Yet whenever I accessed the paths, they stayed true to the last modifications I did.
Again... it depends on what you're faced with. And with the OP's layer images, converting to a path did the trick for me.