Hi everybody
I am new to this forum, so I want to thank in advance all the people for the patience and help they will provide to me!
I am set for printing a certain number of pictures taken with a Canon Eos 5D; the prints will be A3+ and A2 size. The pictures are mostly about city scape and many of them have a quite troubled exposure (mist, sunsets, rainy weather and so on). With this goal in mind, I would like to clearly understand if upsampling the file size through the CS3 Camera Raw "Workflow Options", would give to the file any valuable improvement in terms of better contrast, detail enhancement, etc and if choosing to upsample this way has any consequence (either way) on noise.
I have been on other forums too inquiring about this issue, but at now the response is quite controversial: for some "it just doesn't make any difference", for others "it does, but it depends...".
I hope here at Photoshopgurus to find, if possible, a sharper answer to my question!
Again, thanks to everybody will help me!
Fabio
I am new to this forum, so I want to thank in advance all the people for the patience and help they will provide to me!
I am set for printing a certain number of pictures taken with a Canon Eos 5D; the prints will be A3+ and A2 size. The pictures are mostly about city scape and many of them have a quite troubled exposure (mist, sunsets, rainy weather and so on). With this goal in mind, I would like to clearly understand if upsampling the file size through the CS3 Camera Raw "Workflow Options", would give to the file any valuable improvement in terms of better contrast, detail enhancement, etc and if choosing to upsample this way has any consequence (either way) on noise.
I have been on other forums too inquiring about this issue, but at now the response is quite controversial: for some "it just doesn't make any difference", for others "it does, but it depends...".
I hope here at Photoshopgurus to find, if possible, a sharper answer to my question!
Again, thanks to everybody will help me!
Fabio