What's new
Photoshop Gurus Forum

Welcome to Photoshop Gurus forum. Register a free account today to become a member! It's completely free. Once signed in, you'll enjoy an ad-free experience and be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Problem: Less FX detail with a higher picture dimension!?


Mr.Swag

Member
Messages
13
Likes
2
Do you know why the dimension has to be really low for the oil filter and sharpen effect to become more noticeable? I tried it with a picture that was 3000 x 2000 or something and I couldn't see any of the effects I added, they made a very small difference. Then with this Beiber one that is 600 x 600 I could notice a HUGE difference. Any ideas? THANKS :D!JUSTIN-egg.jpg
 
Last edited:
Think of it this way: Filters like this, USM, HPF, etc. all have a "length scale" or "radius" (in pixels) that you can set. If you set the length scale to, say, 10 pixels, it's effects will spread out over 10% of the width of a 100 pixel wide thumbnail. In contrast, the effects of the filter will spread out to only 0.2% (ie, 10/5000) of the width of a high resolution, 5000 pixel wide image. The first case will likely be too dramatic of an effect, whereas in the latter case, the effects will hardly be visible.

To confuse matters, a few filters, notably, some 3rd party plugins, are aware of the above problem, and instead of letting the user set the length scale in pixels, they adjust the length scale in percent of the size of the image. In these (fairly rare) cases, you would see almost no difference in the effect (other than the expected pixelation) as you change from small to large images.

HTH,

Tom
 

Back
Top