What's new
Photoshop Gurus Forum

Welcome to Photoshop Gurus forum. Register a free account today to become a member! It's completely free. Once signed in, you'll enjoy an ad-free experience and be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Photo damaged by sunlight - uneven background


thealley

New Member
Messages
4
Likes
0
Hello,

I have this old photo which has been inside a frame for quite some time, so I scanned it to have a digital copy. Unfortunately, the photo lost the colours especially in the middle part (as the borders where hidden from sunlight by the frame). Can you please suggest me some methods to use with CS6 to make all the background even?

I'm showing only a part of the photo for privacy reasons.

Thanks for your help!
 

Attachments

  • scan0001.jpg
    scan0001.jpg
    29.2 KB · Views: 37
Well....you want info on how to fix the whole, but we have to guess what the rest looks like....I know security and privacy. So I did a couple of layer copies, changed over to linear burn to darken things, then a B&W adjustment layer, and look at all the options, I went darker. Without seeing what you want to match I don't know where to go, lighter, darker, adjust contrast.....

scan0001a.jpgscan0001.jpg
 
I think it's trying to match just behind the head with the edges that are darker or the darker edges to the color behind head
 
Thanks for your replies. As iDad says, (besides adjusting the image colours etc...) I want to make the background even (same colour everywhere). The part not hidden by the frame has lost colour due to sunlight.

I'm re-uploading a full image with the face blurred.
 

Attachments

  • scan0001.jpg
    scan0001.jpg
    131.2 KB · Views: 4
colors are gone you need to repaint, that means a serious selection of areas to get it right
, along with serious time and skill
 
Agreed with Idad....I still would think of a B&W conversion...Looks like enough tones to get a decent image . as the background goes, a simple crop will solve that. The job you wish help with, hand coloring after getting the image even is a real time consuming job. I would pass it on to an expert. it can be done using CS6, with years of training and practice.
 
@OP:

I know that your stated concern was the differential photobleaching in the print. However, there is another very serious (but easily fixed) problem with the images that you posted that make it almost pointless to work on these scans. This is because while it might be possible to get the dark band around the edge to look like the adjacent interior areas, the brightest details in the interior region are now forever lost in your scans.

You seriously overexposed the scan. My guess is that you either (a) had the scanner set on the wrong mode, or (b), you manually set the scan parameters incorrectly, or (c) the scanner's "auto" exposure mode is not very good.

Specifically, when you are trying to retrieve highlight detail from a print or other document that is already quite light, one of the worst things one can possibly do is to overexpose the scan. Doing so essentially guarantees that no one will be able to extract good tonal and color information out of the bright areas on the print. The very brightest areas in your print should map to no more than 245 or so after the scan. Currently, even areas in the print that are not all that bright are maxed out at 255.

The attached image clearly shows this. It shows your image thresholded at a brightness of 249 (out of a maximum of 255). Everything in the scan brighter than 249 is shown in white. Everything under this brightness is shown in black. Notice how much white there is. There should be none or almost none.

I would suggest that you set your scanner on manual exposure mode and adjust the black and white endpoints appropriately.

A second way to improve the ability of others to work on your image is to save the scan as a 16 bit per channel TIF instead of as an 8 bit per channel JPG. Doing so immediately provides two benefits: 256 times finer tonal resolution, and no JPG compression artifacts (clearly visible as the blocks in post #2 in this thread).

If you can provide a better scan, it will provide our members with a much better starting point, as well as more motivation to work on your request.

HTH,

Tom M
 
Whoops ... I forgot to attach the thresholded version to my previous post.

Here it is.

Tom
 

Attachments

  • scan0001-threshold_249.jpg
    scan0001-threshold_249.jpg
    123.5 KB · Views: 14

Back
Top