It will take a very high level of skill to do a good (ie, convincing) job extracting you from the background in that photo. There are several reasons:
1. There is softness of focus and subject or camera movement. This makes the borders between the subject and the background indistinct. Crisp borders are vastly easier to deal with.
2. There is veiling glare in the RHS of the image that bleeds into your dress and makes those areas less saturated / pastel. Even if someone does a decent extraction and places you against a background that isn't overexposed, your dress will look oddly pastel-like in the areas that had bleeding. That will have to be dealt with.
3. Hair is a complicated texture. It's most easily extracted from a simple, less textured background. Unfortunately, the background to some of your hair is vegetation, ie, another highly textured material. The OOF and movement blur make the extraction of hair from the background much more difficult than it would have been without these problems.
It will be easy for many people to perform a mediocre extraction / background replacement. In other words, you will likely see halos and other artifacts around you. It will be vastly more difficult to do a good job on this extraction.
If you would like to see a short tutorial on extracting hair from a background, look at this video:
http://youtube.googleapis.com/v/0G4dSJrn9aU?fs=1&hl=en_US&fs=1&autoplay=1
It's for a commercial plugin, Topaz Re-mask that is designed to help people with this sort of task, but the general principles covered in that video are applicable to almost any method of extracting a subject from a background.
HTH,
Tom M
PS - One more issue: Part of the "background" (ie, vegetation) is actually in front of you and obscuring parts of your body. To remove this will require synthesizing credible fake skin under where the leaves currently are obscuring you. This can be quite difficult.