What's new
By:
Photoshop Gurus Forum

Welcome to Photoshop Gurus forum. Register a free account today to become a member! It's completely free. Once signed in, you'll enjoy an ad-free experience and be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Apple Aperature Software


Status
Not open for further replies.
G

gare

Power User
Messages
239
Likes
0
I see Apple has unveiled Aperture today. It's advertised as an image editor for professional photographers, with a SMRP of $500. You can pre-order it, which suggests it's not been released yet. I'm supposing it's Macintosh-only, and should be a welcome upgrade from iPhoto.

The screen caps show exposure, color-correction, histograms, red eye reduction (I've never heard of a professional photographer using a flash mounted on a camera, tho'), and other Photoshop features (I don't see a clone tool), and my take is that Aperture will have more political impact than technological--Aperture's main claim is to RAW image format expertise, and there's currently no single standard for RAW--every camera manufacturer uses a unique RAW flavor and that's got Adobe scrambling for profiles for PS.

Apple has not historically played nice with business partners, including IBM, Motorola (but they're dancing again with the new iPods), and smaller developers--Apple's scripting language was sort of appropriated from a Little Guy. But Apple going toe-to-toe with Adobe is going to send smoke signals, fer shure. Adobe's in a funny position of late: they're targeting the home market, but at the same time Microsoft has made its intentions clear about taking a bite out of Adobe graphics dominance. I dunno--Microsoft's got very deep pockets and they've successfully killed WordPerfect and Netscape. They've still not unveiled any graphics software that looks like a threat to Adobe--Paint.Net ain't it, and Expressions won't dent Illustrator sales. Has anyone tried out Xara Xtreme yet? Xara is finally going Mac and Linux in addition to Windows, and I've been using Xara Prime for image retouching lately, when I need extreme zooms and precision. Open Source seems to be the direction programs are heading; Xara is written in assembly I believe, and open source code developers innovations could be compiled and added to Xara to enhance it. They're implementing SVG, too, and perhaps a standard will come of it, making competition for Flash, something Adobe will not welcome. And I see Inkscape developers are talking with Xara.

Any thoughts, folks? These are fascinating technological times, but also interesting big business stuff. Twenty years ago, America's richest people wre oil barons; today, 8 of the 10 richest people own tech companies.

My Best,

Gare
 
Re: New software

Hi Gare,

I've watched all the videos about Aperture today and it looks to be a typical Apple first version... very powerful and polished software which is incredibly easy to use. At present it seems like a very sophisticated archival/browser tool which only performs global edits and integrates with Photoshop and other more creative applications. The approach is very smart, working with 16 bit RAW files in real time and the original file is never touched in a completely non destructive mode. (Oh and there is a sort of clone/patch tool.)

Were I a professional photographer using a digital workflow, I suspect this would be a must-have application. As don't really do that much with photographs it is only a curiosity. In the future we are sure to see Aperture extend it's creative horizons by accessing the built in filters in Apple's Core Image technology which was released with Tiger. Right now the most functional use of this technology is iMaginator by Stone Studios. For video about Aperture... http://www.apple.com/aperture/quicktours/?compare


Xara Xtreme is going to become a household name for graphic artists as soon as the Mac/Linux versions are released. Again, I've looked at all the info on Xtreme but have to wait to see if they can announce the Mac version or my main monitor gets fixed and returned first. My computer life is still in upheaval. I do think Xara is wonderful software and an antidote to super expensive corporate software packages. Heck I got a PC just for Xara products! (Well, those and Dragon Naturally Speaking.)

It is my opinion that Xara is the 'next big thing' in graphics.
 
Re: New software

I agree with you Welles. I became a Xara convert a couple of years ago, and with the recent announcement of it becoming open source for Mac and Linux, I think a lot of eyes will be opened within the graphics community. I find that as it is, right now I'm still using Illy for most pre-press (on my Mac), but I can also foresee how a lot of the frustrations that I have going from Xara to Illy will be minimal once a Mac version is in place. I'm still finding issues with going to PDF, even with Xtreme.

That's a hope, anyway.
 
Xara and CorelDraw

I describe Xara to novices as a vector drawing app that thinks it's a bitmap editor--with the right after-market book (I wish I could write it), Xara could be an all-in-one image creation program for household use. The main hurdle I see is PostScript technology, which Adobe owns. PostScript has mutated in recent revs to merge with Acrobat technology, and there exists at least two different flavors--Illustrator can save *.ai files to CS or version 3 format. And all the new Adobe products can parse the CS PS flavor. But Xara can only write to Illustrator 5 (or 6 I think) Illustrator format--it doesn't understand CS PS, and for some reason, Photoshop CS 2 won't read Xara *.ai files.

On a similar note, the fast-dying CorelDraw (I see they've exited the Mac market) still contains some very useful tools that Xara has not imitated. I need spirals for some work; InkScape and CorelDraw v. 6 and later have this tool. Also, nobody's knocked off the symmetrigon tool--a must-have tool for making gears and other complex shapes. But like Xara, it can't write *.ai files PS can read.

CorelDraw has also always had a TrueType and Type 1 font export. I create fonts as a sideline, and I have to say that although the dormant Fontographer and the robust FontLab write flawless font code, you couldn't ask for a better font creation window than CorelDraw's...except Xara's, if it did font export. I'm not alone: Nick Curtis is a well-known font cobbler who keeps a version of Draw around for character creation, then fine-tunes his fonts in Fontographer. You can get an older copy of Draw, version 5 or something, in the close-out bins at places like Staple's, for ten bucks. Every version of Draw could export fonts, so if anyone has the burning desire, a good font program costs 20 to 30x that much.

CorelDraw implemented on-screen anti-aliasing and vector shape transparency only after they licensed Xara (for 10 painful years, remember how Corel marketing tried to pigeonhole Xara as a Web graphics app?), and it looks as though Illustrator learned from Xara as well. I say it's time Xara, Ltd. did a little borrowing back.

My Best,

Gare
 
Darkling Dark Tree shader

Darkling's Dark Tree shader isn't new, but I've never seen it discussed.

It's a procedural texture creater, it's $400 and change, but worth every penny IMO if you need a good and quick texture background. http://www.darksim.com/

If you're not familiar with a procedural tree shader, first, it has nothing to do with physical trees--the "tree" is a cascading list of color, bump, and other components which you add to in branching order. Procedural means the resulting texture is made from a recipe of math equations, which can include fractals...and even bitmap samples, but overall, a procedural texture formula is scalable, producing images of almost any resolution with clarity. And textures can be animated.

This is the best texture farm I've seen since Alien Skin's TextureShop which was released as a Mac-only program.

Below is a crummy, short gif (due to file limits here) of wafting cloth. Animated smoke and fire are also easy to create, but you need an animation compiler such as Painter (or ImageReady) as sadly, Dark Tree can only write sequentional stills, in 24, not 32 bit.

My Best,

Gare
 
Re: New software

I looked at Aperture today, too. Typical Apple in that it is a very cool piece of software from a design and function point of view. Apple has always been good at that. Better than the Bridge? No, not in my opinion and that's it's main competition. Certainly not a replacement for Photoshop - not even close. Then again, I really don't think they were trying to compete with PS.

Actually, truth be known, in may respects I liked it better than PS's Bridge. They both have their strong points but that light table feature was way cool. Also, I liked how the program grouped images together based on how they were photographed - ie bracketed images - before you even downloaded them. There were a few others I really liked and can't think of them right now. Problem for me is the price. I would add it in a heartbeat if it was $100 to $149. $500 is out of the question. My finance is back in school going for her Masters so we qualify for student discount prices but I heard that was $249. Still too much for me as I don't think I'd get $250 benefit over the Bridge.

Film at 11
 
Re: New software

Lee! Haven't heard from you in a while--hi!

Lee said:
My finance is back in school going for her Masters...
Click to expand...

[shhh] Lee...it's fianc?, but unintentionally made your remark a propos. ;)

Adobe Bridge seems to be an equivalent of Adobe Elements' (or Album's) Organizer module. I don't see any editing features, but instead just a convenient thingy to preview and load images for editing in PS. I use iMatch for archiving and cataloguing--it costs $$$ while Bridge is free, but it's very quick, and the biggest difference is that iMatch uses a standard database format. Which means I can play with the database in Excel and Access--in contrast, Bridge uses a proprietary database. Both iMatch and Adobe have ITPC standard fields and display camera data recorded with digital photos.

On Xtreme: the biggest push will be Xara going open source. As their FAQ said, this decision ain't going to make the company rich, but that's not their goal. You're going to have developers parachuting from all continents to play with and tweak the code--I expect the Inkscape folks will have some tastey stuff to add.

M y Best,

Gare
 
Re: New software

LOL - Can't tell what I have (unconsciencly) on my mind, can you?
 
Thanks, Welles!

Dave and Bruce Fraiser are two Photoshop gurus I trust; they're not the pop stars I'll not name--I'm downloading the podcast right now.

Which sort of begs the question: when will there be a Windows version of Aperture? One would think that Steve J. had learned his lesson with the iPod--ya got a serious product to roll out, you do it to all platforms.

My Best,

Gare
 
Re: New software

Great Podcast, very informative. Thanks for posting that, Welles. Based on that information I went ahead and pre-ordered it as I have access to student pricing through Rachel (my better half). I would definitely not have purchased at $499 but $249 seems reasonable after listening to someone who has really used the actual program. I though he did a great job of showing both the pluses and minuses of the software. I had originally posted that $149 would be the price I'd consider but that may have been a little premature.

Anyway, I don't use iPhoto at all and have never been real happy with the Bridge. It's very versatile and all but..... As I plan on primarily using Aperture as a way to sort and store my images (well over 2000) it looks great. PS will always be my choice for manipulating those images, though.
 
Aperture and new hardware

I hope Aperture serves you well, Lee. It most certainly looks and smells like the professional photographer's tool that is the claim.

Recently, I've been working with RAW; my camera's almost 5 years old, doesn't write RAW, so I use images my friends have taken. I see that both PS and Elements pop up a special interface when you load a RAW image. Like Aperture (I'm supposing), you have a histogram, and several tone and color correction features, but no real selection or painting tools. And like Aperture, you work by proxy, never tampering with the uncorrected, raw data stream; you can open a proxy image, or perform basic corrections saved to a copy of the digital negative. Then, to use the full complement of PS tools, you must dither down to 24-bit. I hope Lee or someone else who buys Aperture will eventually post some features Adobe has never covered; a reason to buy, you know?

Working with images that are what PS calls 16-bit (16-bits per channel, for a real sum of 48-bit images) has lead me to some interesting conclusions. Because common PCs have a video subsystem and display that tops out at 24-bit, you're sort of working on faith, working with data you can't see--which reminds me of a guy I met late at night on a NYC subway who was conversing with Martians to solve the ytterbium crisis in America.

The advice I give people who edit 32-bit images begins with a paradigm. Imagine a gallon jug into which you pour a gallon of water. Then you compress the water--some spills out. Then imagine using the Levels command on a 32-bit image; you compress it while you're remapping the brightness values of the pixels, and some tones "spill out". Suppose you're left with a quart of pixels in this gallon container. Yep, there's a loss, but less net loss than if you open a TIFF (call it a quart container holding a quart of pixels) and perform Levels on it.

So I recommend bumping the container for TIFFs up to 16-bit/channel (48), do your editing, then go back to 8-bit (24) for a save.

BTW, I see that PS can save 32-bit images to TIFF and JPEG in addition to psd, in case further editing might be needed.

My Best,

Gare
 
Re: New software

Gare - At one point a few months ago you were going to use PNG for storage etc. Did you decide to do that?
 
yes!

Yes I am, Lee and BTW thanks for turning us on to SuperPNG! :righton:

In addition to levels of compression (I could do with more precise controls, but hey, the price was right), Super PNG can save to Adobe RGB color space, and embed metadata tags for camera, copyright, and EXIF fields. PS's png export doesn't do that, so adding a copyright and your email address to posted photos makes one more resaon to run, don't walk to http://www.fnordware.com/superpng/ and get this for Mac and/or Win.

My Best,

Gare
 
Xara Xtreme

I usually cartoon around in Xara, but yesterday I had a dilema--I need to show digital cameras in a book I'm writing, and couldn't get a response from manufacterer's press rooms online for permission to use their photos.

So I drew them using Xara Xtreme. Boy, is it fast and responsive!

My Best,

Gare
 
WOW, this thread goes way back started 10-19-2005. May I suggest start another thread asking for what you need. Currently, Aperature Software comes with all new Mac's.
 
lovelyv,
I use aperture your best bet is to ask apple forums about it there are more threads there about it
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top