Hi,
I bought a new computer and the salesman convinced me to add Photoshop CS2 to the deal. I have previously worked a lot on my old computer with (lo and behold!) Photoshop 5.5. I feel I know it as good as a hobby enthusiast needs to, but I am not a pro (nor do I need to be). I admit I bought CS2 more for being uptodate with software and from the *feeling* I was missing out on features rather than *knowing* it to be so.
Now, I guess a lot of things have changed since 5.5 so I wonder if I will be ok with just the manual or if I should get something else as well for training purposes (bear in mind, this is a hobby endeavour and I am not setting out to work professionally with PS, just build my personal websites and making hobby graphics). But since it took me 5 years to find out how to create a square wich is not filled but simply stroked (I never understood that I should be reading about stroking paths, I was just angry there was no 'create non-filled square' tool), I would like to avoid similar restraints on my creativity when switching to CS2. This anecdote may indicate a very superficial knowledge of 5.5, but I think rather that my problem is that since I never bothered trying to learn 5.5 from the beginning (since I am just a hobby enthusiast) I know some things quite well, but there are also elementary things that I ignore.
I saw a great deal on ebay for the CS essential training dvd, which was so cheap I consider buying it, because I have not found any deals on the training dvd for CS2, and I certainly won't fork out the retail monies for it, I am not that keen on learning. But would this be stupid, I mean using CS-training material to get to learn CS2?
Or should I rather get for instance Sams Teach Yourself CS2 in 24 hours (or a more substantial book)?
I guess video or book is a personal like/dislike issue but I have no experience with any PS training material apart from the manual for 5.5, so I can't really tell which training suits me, hobby enthusiast as I am.
Any general comments on this, guys and gals?
Thanks a lot!
P
I bought a new computer and the salesman convinced me to add Photoshop CS2 to the deal. I have previously worked a lot on my old computer with (lo and behold!) Photoshop 5.5. I feel I know it as good as a hobby enthusiast needs to, but I am not a pro (nor do I need to be). I admit I bought CS2 more for being uptodate with software and from the *feeling* I was missing out on features rather than *knowing* it to be so.
Now, I guess a lot of things have changed since 5.5 so I wonder if I will be ok with just the manual or if I should get something else as well for training purposes (bear in mind, this is a hobby endeavour and I am not setting out to work professionally with PS, just build my personal websites and making hobby graphics). But since it took me 5 years to find out how to create a square wich is not filled but simply stroked (I never understood that I should be reading about stroking paths, I was just angry there was no 'create non-filled square' tool), I would like to avoid similar restraints on my creativity when switching to CS2. This anecdote may indicate a very superficial knowledge of 5.5, but I think rather that my problem is that since I never bothered trying to learn 5.5 from the beginning (since I am just a hobby enthusiast) I know some things quite well, but there are also elementary things that I ignore.
I saw a great deal on ebay for the CS essential training dvd, which was so cheap I consider buying it, because I have not found any deals on the training dvd for CS2, and I certainly won't fork out the retail monies for it, I am not that keen on learning. But would this be stupid, I mean using CS-training material to get to learn CS2?
Or should I rather get for instance Sams Teach Yourself CS2 in 24 hours (or a more substantial book)?
I guess video or book is a personal like/dislike issue but I have no experience with any PS training material apart from the manual for 5.5, so I can't really tell which training suits me, hobby enthusiast as I am.
Any general comments on this, guys and gals?
Thanks a lot!
P